DIY screenshot sharing service

I often find it useful to send someone a screenshot - to facilitate some explanation, to point out a bug in some app, or maybe even just brag about my awesome desktop.

Obviously, I can open a terminal, start some screenshot app, save screenshot to file, upload a file somewhere, then figure out the link, etc - quite repetitive, I think.

Or I could use some of the new-and-popular screenshot uploading services - like Gyazo for example. But all those services require you to install some package or application, which looks ridiculous for such a simple task.

But we are Linux users, aren't we? We can always do better! Especially when we have some rusty bash skills, barely alive web-facing server somewhere in our closet, and half an hour of free time on our hands.
#!/bin/bash

f=$(mktemp -u screenshot_XXXXXX.png)
import /tmp/$f
scp /tmp/$f server:/some/webroot/
rm /tmp/$f
url="http://your.server.hostname/$f"
echo $url | xclip
echo $url | xclip -sel c
echo $url
The above script uses ImageMagick's "import" command to let user select a rectangle on screen and save it to file, uploads that file to server (you'll need public key authentication set up for this to work without hassle), and puts url for newly created screenshot into clipboard using "xclip" utility.

I even bound this script to standard PrintScreen key, and now screenshot upload is a totally painless experience.

P.S. Actually, if you look closely, you will find that Gyazo's linux package does essentially the same. But I still don't like the idea of extra package for such task.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How to create your own simple 3D render engine in pure Java

Image
3D render engines that are nowdays used in games and multimedia production are breathtaking in complexity of mathematics and programming used. Results they produce are correspondingly stunning. Many developers may think that building even the simplest 3D application from scratch requires inhuman knowledge and effort, but thankfully that isn't always the case. Here I'd like to share with you how you can build your very own 3D render engine, fully capable of producing nice-looking 3D images. Why would you want to build a 3D engine? At the very least, it will really help understanding how real modern engines do their black magic. Also it is sometimes useful to add 3D rendering capabilities to your application without calling to huge external dependencies. In case of Java, that means that you can build 3D viewer app with zero dependencies (apart from Java...
Read more

Solving quadruple dependency injection problem in Angular

Angular comes with built-in dependency injection and module management system, but it can get a bit tedious to use when your project grows. Especially if you use RequireJS alongside it (a must for almost any project) and also want to be minification-safe with all those dependency injections. Let's look at a simple example with one module that provides a value and another module that prints that value: // answer.js define(["angular"], function(angular) { angular.module("the.answer") .value("TheAnswer", 42); }); // main.js define(["angular", "the.answer" ], function(angular) { angular.module("main", [ "the.answer" ]) .run([ "TheAnswer" , function( TheAnswer ) { console.log(TheAnswer); }]); }); As you can see, to provide a single dependency to my code, I had to specify it in four places (highlighted in red) - first as RequireJS dependency, then as Angular module dependency,...
Read more

Configuration objects in Scallop

It turned out that spreading type annotations throughout all the code in all places where options are requested is not a good idea. And, of course, it is prone to errors - who likes those type annotations? When using such option parsing libraries, users usually end up creating a big object with fields corresponding to each option: object Conf { var apples:Int = 0 var bananas:Int = 0 } // ... parsing options ... Conf.apples = parser.getOption("option name", ...) Conf.bananas = parser.getOption("other option name", ...) Sure, this works, and usually flexible enough - but why would anybody want to create such boilerplate? And by the way, nobody likes var's in their code :) So in Scallop , I needed to cut down that unnecessary repetition. There are several ways: Create a compiler plugin. The most powerful option. And the least enjoyable - even given the ease of installing a compiler plugin using sbt, I doubt that anybody will install compiler p...
Read more